AI tools accelerate individual typing speed while breaking your downstream software delivery lifecycle. I help European engineering leaders resolve the “Review Economics” bottleneck, secure compliance, and extract predictable delivery ROI from AI platform architectures.
As trusted by
GitHub Copilot · Review Economics tooling · DORA uplift
£400k+ annualised savings · AI FinOps · LLM cost attribution
GitHub Enterprise · AI-ready CI/CD · SAST at scale
UK & US AI governance · Platform architecture · Cloud FinOps
AI coding tools solve the individual speed problem and create an organisational one. Here's what that looks like in practice.
The divergence your DORA metrics aren’t showing you
After AI tool deployment, these two metrics decouple. Most engineering leaders don’t see it until licence renewal.
AI tools increase average PR sizes by 20%. Those larger, faster-arriving PRs land in the queue of your most senior, and most bottlenecked, engineers.
Your lead time isn't improving because the bottleneck moved from writing to reviewing, and your DORA metrics are masking it.
AI-assisted developers are 20–30% more likely to introduce security vulnerabilities—LLMs generate outdated patterns, insecure defaults, and hallucinated dependencies.
For B2B SaaS vendors, your enterprise clients are asking whether their data is being pasted into public LLM prompts. One leakage incident fails your SOC 2 audit and loses you the contract.
NIST AI RMF adoption is accelerating. The UK DSIT AI Framework and ICO guidance are tightening. Most engineering teams have zero documented AI governance posture when auditors or enterprise buyers ask.
UK and US enterprise clients are now requiring AI governance attestation in procurement. No documented posture means no contract. The exposure is commercial, not just regulatory.
Closing the gap between local AI coding speeds and organisational lead times.
Measure the hidden Review Economics bottleneck. Establish a baseline for DORA/SPACE metrics before investing further in AI tooling.
Audit EngagementEstablish a defensible AI governance posture for UK and US enterprises. Map exposure across NIST AI RMF, UK DSIT guidelines, OWASP LLM Top 10, IP risk, and responsible deployment controls.
UK & US Governance AssessmentShift the source of truth from code to formal specifications, allowing AI agents to generate correct software without the rework tax.
Read WhitepaperEliminate waste on idle or oversized LLM infrastructure. Cut costs by 40–70% via strategic model selection, workload right-sizing, and spend attribution.
Discuss OptimisationDiagnostic Sprint: My most requested engagement for 2026. A 4-week fixed-scope audit mapping your true AI delivery performance. I establish your DORA baseline, quantify Review Economics bottlenecks, and implement Automated Quality Gates—moving at scale-up speed without enterprise bloat.
Free 30-min scoping call first.
No commitment, no pressure.
The Agentic Coding Session — Now a Free Download
The live session attended by 2,000+ engineers, distilled into a practical framework. Learn the system that closes the AI Production Gap.
The Spec-Driven Engineering Framework
How to Close the AI Production Gap
Every strategic engagement begins with the AI-SDLC Maturity Audit, the 4-week diagnostic gateway. These are the specialized tracks your audit findings prescribe.
The Engagement Path: AI-SDLC Maturity Audit → Targeted Implementations (Compliance / SDD) → Fractional AI Officer. You don’t choose a track blind. The audit defines the exact priority and sequence.
Purpose-built for UK and US enterprises that need a documented, defensible AI governance posture. This rolling service delivers NIST AI RMF alignment, OWASP LLM Top 10 security controls, AI Literacy training, IP and copyright exposure review, and audit-ready technical documentation. Secure legal, infosec, and board sign-off before your enterprise buyers or auditors ask.
RollingStop writing code. Start writing specifications. This 6–8 week engagement shifts teams to the full SDD methodology (Specify, Plan, Decompose, Implement, Validate). Markdown specifications become the authoritative source of truth. By having AI generate code directly from specs, we eliminate LLM guesswork and solve context rot. Delivery drops from days to hours.
6–8 WeeksCut LLM inference costs 40–70% via strategic model selection and workload right-sizing. Predictive token tracking with AWS Lambda attributes spend to users, teams, or features, so AI ROI is measurable, not assumed.
3–4 WeeksFortune 100 AI engineering governance without the full-time headcount cost. 1–3 days per month covering tooling strategy, vendor evaluation, SDLC architecture decisions, and board-level AI ROI reporting—designed for scale-ups that need enterprise-grade velocity without a £200k/year full-time hire.
OngoingHigh-impact workshops that move engineering teams, managers, and leadership from AI-curious to AI-effective. From GitHub Copilot fundamentals to responsible AI governance, for audiences of 10 to 2,000+. Every session is tailored, hands-on, and designed to satisfy board, legal, and employee consultation requirements.
Half / Full DayEnterprise engagements succeed or fail on integration discipline. Here is exactly how I protect your team’s momentum.
I do not require a seat in your daily standups or a manager to assign me tasks. I operate autonomously against an agreed statement of work, surfacing blockers directly to the principal sponsor, not the delivery team.
Progress is delivered via structured weekly executive summaries and clear technical documentation. Your engineers receive no calendar invitations and no Slack noise unless they are the direct owners of a decision point.
I plug directly into your existing enterprise stack—Jira, GitHub Enterprise, Azure DevOps, or AWS Organizations—without introducing new software vendor dependencies or procurement cycles.
Real numbers from real projects. Clients anonymised at their request.
A 7,000-person engineering organisation with AI tool licences deployed, individual coding speed improving, and organisational lead time flatlining. No governance framework, no pipeline tooling, no SDLC redesign. Pilots were running. Production was not being reached.
End-to-end architecture and delivery of the enterprise GitHub Copilot rollout: governance frameworks, AI Literacy training at scale, pipeline optimisations to resolve the senior reviewer bottleneck, and Automated Quality Gates calibrated for AI-authored code vulnerability patterns.
Full production at 7,000-engineer scale. DORA improvement across all four indicators: deploy frequency, lead time, change failure rate, and MTTR. The only enterprise AI rollout at this scale confirmed to have simultaneously closed the Review Economics gap.
A Fortune 500 Agriculture enterprise paying for cloud infrastructure it couldn’t see clearly. AI and ML workloads were compounding the waste, idle inference instances, oversized LLM deployments, and no attribution of which teams or features were driving spend.
Full cloud cost audit: rightsizing, Reserved Instance optimisation, zombie resource cleanup. LLM inference cost tracking via AWS Lambda with attribution by team, user, and feature. Spend dashboards that surfaced the real AI ROI gap and made it impossible to ignore.
30% cloud cost reduction. £400k+ in annualised savings. Infrastructure spend became a managed variable rather than a mounting liability. Dashboards and attribution tooling ensured savings persisted long after handover.
An entire engineering workforce operating on fragmented toolchains, inconsistent branching strategies, no SAST, no standardised CI/CD. Introducing AI coding tools on this foundation would have accelerated entropy and crippled the review pipeline.
Full engineering workforce migration to GitHub Enterprise: standardised CI/CD pipelines, branch protection rules, SAST tooling calibrated to catch AI-specific vulnerability patterns. The secure architectural foundation required before any safe AI-assisted development at scale.
100% engineering workforce on a standardised, AI-ready delivery platform. Zero bottleneck collapse during the subsequent AI tool rollout. The governance and tooling foundation that made the safety and compliance story possible.
Most AI consultants have observed enterprise AI from a safe distance. I've operated it in environments where failure is not a sprint-retrospective item, it's a liability event.
of enterprises have an AI pilot running · reach sustained production
The Production Gap is not a technology failure. It is a governance, SDLC architecture, and organisational design failure, and it is precisely what I was hired to close at Fortune 100 scale.
I architected AI systems in environments where an untested output is a liability event, not a simple bug. That standard defines every engagement: governance architecture precedes velocity. It is the difference between a resilient enterprise rollout and one that collapses after consultants leave.
The gap between pilots and production cannot be closed by simply buying tools. It requires fixing the underlying organisational systems. I led a 7,000-engineer rollout to full production with sustained DORA improvements. I know exactly where enterprise rollouts break, and how to fix them.
From North American NIST AI RMF alignment to UK DSIT and ICO requirements, I design for regulatory durability across both markets. Generic consultants optimise for quick pilots. I build governance frameworks that withstand strict scrutiny from enterprise buyers, legal teams, and auditors.
Institutional engagements. Corporate names are redacted to protect proprietary source code architecture, trade secrets, and ongoing regulatory postures. Full identity validation is available under reciprocal NDA during onboarding.
"Matt didn't just roll out GitHub Copilot, he redesigned how our engineering organisation reviews and ships AI-generated code. Adoption went up, but so did our DORA scores. That combination is genuinely rare."
"We thought our AI investment was paying off until Matt showed us the Review Economics numbers. Senior engineers were spending 40% more time in code review. He fixed the pipeline in two weeks and the change was immediately visible in our lead time metrics."
"Matt's AI governance framework gave us the structure our legal and infosec teams needed before our board presentation. We went from 'we're using Copilot' to having a documented risk posture, auditability controls, and a vendor evaluation policy. Night and day."
I’m Matt Drankowski, Agentic AI Architect and Fractional AI Officer based in Kraków, Poland. I design AI-native engineering systems for enterprises where pilots are already running, organisational lead time isn’t improving, and the Production Gap is becoming a board-level concern.
The hard part isn't the tooling. My most recent enterprise role was architecting the GitHub Copilot rollout across a Fortune 100 organisation. That work proved technical implementation is the easy part. The real challenge is resolving pipeline bottlenecks, establishing governance, running AI Literacy programmes, and proving lead time impact—all while navigating security audit and compliance review.
Enterprise platform pedigree. I carry 13+ years of AWS and platform engineering experience into every engagement, from LLM inference cost optimisation and spend attribution to AI governance frameworks for UK and US enterprises navigating NIST AI RMF, IP risk, and responsible deployment mandates.
Two proprietary analytical frameworks. Most organisations discover material gaps they were not tracking.
An analytical model to isolate your actual engineering delivery velocity from raw local typing acceleration. Input your team size, DORA baselines, AI tool spend, and PR volume to surface your Review Economics exposure and Code Volume Inflation coefficient.
Access the Institutional ModelA 40-point diagnostic covering NIST AI RMF alignment, OWASP LLM Top 10 security controls, IP and copyright exposure, AI Literacy posture, vendor risk, human oversight, and incident response readiness. Calibrated for UK and US enterprise buyers and auditors. Identify your gaps before they identify you.
Access the Governance AssessmentEnterprise intake for 2026 is currently open. We begin with a 30-minute strategy audit to map your tooling stack, delivery metrics, and current bottlenecks. If there is a clear fit, I scope a fixed engagement within 48 hours. No lengthy proposals, no retainer pressure, just a clear diagnosis and path forward.
I operate on fixed-scope, fixed-price engagements. Most transformations begin with a 4-week diagnostic to establish your DORA baseline and measure the hidden bottlenecks. Follow-on implementation phases—ranging from toolchain automation to governance frameworks—are scoped separately based on diagnostic findings. I do not do body-shopping or open-ended retainers.
Yes. I build AI governance frameworks calibrated to UK and US enterprise requirements—covering NIST AI RMF alignment, UK DSIT and ICO guidance, OWASP LLM Top 10 security controls, IP and copyright exposure from AI-generated code, and audit-ready documentation. The output is a defensible posture your legal, infosec, and board teams can sign off on before enterprise buyers or auditors ask.
Book a free 30-minute strategy audit. We’ll map your current AI tooling, your DORA metrics, and exactly where pipeline bottlenecks are eroding your velocity. No pitch deck. No retainer pressure. Just a clear diagnosis.
“Matt didn’t just roll out GitHub Copilot, he redesigned how our engineering organisation reviews and ships AI-generated code. Adoption went up, but so did our DORA scores. That combination is genuinely rare.” — VP of Software Delivery, Fortune 100 Industrial Systems Group
Not ready yet? Access the executive diagnostic frameworks or email Matt directly